Questions fréquentes.
Les questions essentielles sur Wombat, avec des réponses concises et sans jargon. Cliquez sur une question pour afficher la réponse.
Toutes les questions.
Wombat est volontairement neutre vis-à-vis des fournisseurs. Quand c'est utile, nous renvoyons à la gouvernance et aux RFC plutôt qu'à des prescriptions rigides.
What is Wombat in one sentence?
Wombat is a community-driven framework to assess cloud and platform architectures in a structured way, make decisions traceable, and implement improvements along clear guardrails.
Is Wombat vendor-neutral?
Yes. Wombat is built around principles, patterns, and standards — not around specific products or cloud providers.
Is Wombat a fork of Well-Architected?
No. Wombat uses similar thinking (e.g., guardrails and trade-offs), but extends it with governance, working groups, RFC processes, maturity/scoring approaches, and reference models.
Who is Wombat for?
For platform teams, architects, security/compliance, SRE/operations, and auditors who want to make architecture quality measurable and repeatable — independent of provider and tooling.
What are the 8 pillars?
The pillars bundle perspectives (e.g., cost, security, reliability, sovereign). Each pillar provides guiding questions, evidence/artifact hints, and typical trade-offs.
Which pillars are currently available?
At the start, we prioritize Pillar 2 (Cost Optimization) and Pillar 7 (Sovereign). Additional pillars follow iteratively once content, examples, and scoring approaches have matured sufficiently.
What does 'Sovereign' mean in the Wombat context?
Sovereignty includes data control, controllability, traceability, exit capability, regulatory alignment, and vendor-risk reduction — both technically and organizationally.
Is there a maturity model or scoring?
Yes — as a target vision. We work iteratively: first clear questions & evidence, then scoring/levels and reference models. The approach is meant to be transparent (no black-box assessments).
What does a typical start look like?
Start small: pick a pillar (e.g., cost), answer the guiding questions with evidence (e.g., policies, dashboards, ADRs), derive 3–5 actions, and repeat the cycle regularly.
How do you ensure traceability and auditability?
Through public discussions, reviews, and RFCs. Larger changes are documented as RFCs (problem, options, decision, impact) and versioned.
How can I contribute?
Via issues/PRs, reviews, working groups, use cases from projects/audits, examples (patterns/anti-patterns), or by supporting sessions/BoFs at conferences.
Do I need to contribute code to be a contributor?
No. Content, reviews, discussions, examples, translations, issue triage, and moderation are equally valuable.
How do you handle security topics?
Responsible disclosure: security issues are reported privately and published in a coordinated way. Details are in the repository’s security policy.
Which license does Wombat use?
Wombat uses a dual-license model: Apache License 2.0 for code and CC BY 4.0 for documentation. The authoritative sources are LICENSE/NOTICE in the repository and the notes on /legal/.
Is there a roadmap?
Yes. We prioritize transparently and actively look for contributors for content, reviews, working groups, and real-world examples.
D'autres questions ?
Wombat se construit en public. Si votre question n'a pas de réponse ici, ouvrez une discussion GitHub, proposez une RFC ou rejoignez un groupe de travail.
Posez vos questions directement dans le dépôt : la communauté et les mainteneurs répondent.
Une suggestion ou une lacune repérée ? Le processus RFC est ouvert à tous.
Rejoignez les groupes de travail par pilier pour façonner le contenu, la gouvernance et l'orientation.